$ k8scalc compare longhorn openebs
Longhorn vs OpenEBS
Longhorn vs OpenEBS for Kubernetes persistent storage — compare replica strategies, backup support, UI, and local vs distributed storage options.
Verdict
Longhorn and OpenEBS are both CNCF projects for Kubernetes storage. Longhorn has a significant UX advantage — its built-in web UI for volume management and backup monitoring has no equivalent in OpenEBS. OpenEBS offers more storage engine flexibility: cStor (replicated block), Mayastor (high-performance NVMe), and local PV for node-local storage. For a straightforward replicated block storage with S3 backup, Longhorn wins. For teams needing high-performance NVMe storage or node-local PVs in a mixed environment, OpenEBS is worth evaluating.
Related tool
K8s Cluster Cost
Calculate the monthly cost of running a self-managed Kubernetes cluster on Hetzner Cloud, Vultr, or DigitalOcean. Choose server types for control planes, workers, and load balancers with HA mode.